Advertisement

Is stroke the most common cause of disability?

      Abstract

      Background: It is widely stated that stroke is the most common cause of severe disability. We aimed to examine whether this claim is supported by any evidence. Methods: We conducted secondary analysis of the Office of National Statistics 1996 Survey of Disability, United Kingdom. This was a multistage stratified random sample of 8683 noninstitutionalized individuals aged between 16 and 101 years, mean 62 years, response rate 83% (n = 8816). The outcome used was the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys severity scale for disability. Odds ratios and population-attributable fractions were calculated to examine the associations between diagnoses and disability. Results: Logistic regression modelling suggests that, after adjustment for comorbidity and age, those with stroke had the highest odds of reporting severe overall disability (odds ratio 4.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.37–6.10). Stroke was also associated with more individual domains of disability than any of the other conditions considered. Adjusted population-attributable fractions were also calculated and indicated that musculoskeletal disorders had the highest population-attributable fraction (30.3%, 95% CI 26.2–34.1) followed by mental disorders (8.2%, 95% CI 6.9–9.5) and stroke (4.5%, 95% CI 3.6–5.3). Conclusion: Stroke is not the most common cause of disability among the noninstitutionalized United Kingdom population. However, stroke is associated with the highest odds of reporting severe disability. Importantly, stroke is associated with more individual domains of disability compared with other conditions and might be considered to be the most common cause of complex disability.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • The Stroke Association
        Fundraising. 2004 (Available from: http://www.stroke.org.uk/fundraising.htm. Accessed July 19)
        • American Stroke Association
        About stroke. 2004 (Available from: http://www.strokeassociation.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=11402. Accessed July 19)
        • National Stroke Foundation
        Did you know that. 2004 (Available from: http://www.strokefoundation.com.au/index2.html. Accessed July 19)
        • Elders M.J.
        The increasing impact of arthritis on public health.
        J Rheumatol. 2000; 27: 6-8
        • Newman A.B.
        • Brach J.S.
        Gender gap in longevity and disability in older persons.
        Epidemiol Rev. 2001; 23: 343-350
        • Martin J.
        • Meltzer H.
        • Elliot D.
        The prevalence of disability among adults. HMSO, London1988
        • Devore D.
        1996 Disability survey. HMSO, London1998
        • World Health Organization
        International classification of impairments, disability and handicap (ICIDH). WHO, Geneva1980
        • Warlow C.P.
        • Dennis M.
        • van Gijn J.
        • et al.
        Stroke. 1st ed. Blackwell Science, Oxford1996
        • Harris A.I.
        Handicapped and impaired in Great Britain. HMSO, London1971
        • Pollack M.R.
        • Disler P.B.
        Rehabilitation of patients after stroke.
        Med J Aust. 2002; 177: 452-456
        • Carolei A.
        • Sacco S.
        • De Santis F.
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of stroke.
        Clin Exp Hypertens. 2002; 24: 479-483
        • Essink-Bot M.L.
        • Pereira J.
        • Packer C.
        • et al.
        Cross-national comparability of burden of disease estimates.
        Bull World Health Organ. 2002; 80: 644-652
        • Rothwell P.M.
        The high cost of not funding stroke research.
        Lancet. 2001; 357: 1612-1616
        • Murray C.J.L.
        • Lopez A.D.
        Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020.
        Lancet. 1997; 349: 1498-1504
        • Verbrugge L.M.
        • Lepkowski J.M.
        • Imanaka Y.
        Comorbidity and its impact on disability.
        Milbank Q. 1989; 67: 450-484
        • Guralnik J.M.
        • Ferrucci L.
        • Simonsick E.M.
        • et al.
        Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability.
        N Engl J Med. 1995; 332: 556-561
        • Ostir G.V.
        • Volpato S.
        • Fried L.P.
        • et al.
        Reliability and sensitivity to change assessed for a summary measure of lower body function.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2002; 55: 916-921
        • Guralnik J.M.
        • Branch L.G.
        • Cummings S.R.
        • et al.
        Physical performance measures in aging research.
        J Gerontol Med Sci. 1989; 44: M141-M146
        • Kivinen P.
        • Sulkava R.
        • Halonen P.
        • et al.
        Self-reported and performance-based functional status and associated factors among elderly men.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51: 1243-1252
        • Bickenbach J.E.
        • Chatterji S.
        • Badley E.M.
        • et al.
        Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps.
        Soc Sci Med. 1999; 48: 1173-1187
        • World Health Organization
        International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). WHO, Geneva2001