Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials: An Opportunity for Improved Design of Stroke Reperfusion Trials

      Background

      Modern clinical trials in stroke reperfusion fall into 2 categories: alternative systemic pharmacological regimens to alteplase and “rescue” endovascular approaches using targeted thrombectomy devices and/or medications delivered directly for persistently occluded vessels. Clinical trials in stroke have not evaluated how initial pharmacological thrombolytic management might influence subsequent rescue strategy. A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) is a novel trial design that can test these dynamic treatment regimens and lead to treatment guidelines that more closely mimic practice.

      Aim

      To characterize a SMART design in comparison to traditional approaches for stroke reperfusion trials.

      Methods

      We conducted a numerical simulation study that evaluated the performance of contrasting acute stroke clinical trial designs of both initial reperfusion and rescue therapy. We compare a SMART design where the same patients are followed through initial reperfusion and rescue therapy within 1 trial to a standard phase III design comparing 2 reperfusion treatments and a separate phase II futility design of rescue therapy in terms of sample size, power, and ability to address particular research questions.

      Results

      Traditional trial designs can be well powered and have optimal design characteristics for independent treatment effects. When treatments, such as the reperfusion and rescue therapies, may interact, commonly used designs fail to detect this. A SMART design, with similar sample size to standard designs, can detect treatment interactions.

      Conclusions

      The use of SMART designs to investigate effective and realistic dynamic treatment regimens is a promising way to accelerate the discovery of new, effective treatments for stroke.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke.
        NEJM. 1995; 333: 1581-1588
        • Berkhemer O.A.
        • Fransen P.S.S.
        • Beumer D.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke.
        NEJM. 2015; 372: 11-20
        • Campbell B.C.V.
        • Mitchell P.J.
        • Kleinig T.J.
        • et al.
        Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection.
        NEJM. 2015; 372: 1009-1018
        • Goyal M.
        • Demchuk A.M.
        • Menon B.K.
        • et al.
        Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke.
        NEJM. 2015; 372: 1019-1030
        • Murphy S.A.
        Optimal dynamic treatment regimes.
        J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2003; 65: 331-355
        • Lavori P.W.
        • Dawson R.
        • Rush A.J.
        Flexible treatment strategies in chronic disease: clinical and research implications.
        Biol Psychiatry. 2000; 48: 605-614
        • Murphy S.A.
        An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.
        Stat Med. 2005; 24: 1455-1481
        • Palesch Y.Y.
        • Tilley B.C.
        • Sackett D.L.
        • et al.
        Applying a phase II futility study design to therapeutic stroke trials.
        Stroke. 2005; 36: 2410-2414
        • Coffey C.S.
        • Levin B.
        • Clark C.
        • et al.
        Overview, hurdles, and future work in adaptive designs: perspectives from a National Institutes of Health-funded workshop.
        Clin Trials. 2012; 9: 671-680