Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 29, ISSUE 6, 104804, June 2020

Download started.

Ok

Associations of Antithrombotic Timing and Regimen with Ischemic Stroke and Bleeding Complications in Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury

      Highlights

      • Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are rare but associated with serious complications.
      • Antithrombotics are used to avert the common complication of ischemic stroke.
      • Most strokes here occurred between hospital arrival and antithrombotic initiation.
      • Interruption of treatment was associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke.
      • Antithrombotic regimen was not associated with stroke or bleeding complications.

      Abstract

      Background: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) are associated with long-term neurological effects. The first-line treatment for BCVIs is antithrombotics, but consensus on the optimal choice and timing of treatment is lacking. Methods: This was a retrospective study on patients aged at least 18 years admitted to 6 level 1 trauma centers between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2017 with grade 1-4 BCVI and treated with antithrombotics. Differences in treatment practices were examined across the 6 centers. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke, and secondary outcomes were related to bleeding complications: blood transfusion and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Treatment characteristics examined were time to diagnosis and first computerized tomography angiography, time of total treatment course, time on each antithrombotic (anticoagulants, antiplatelets, combination), time from hospital arrival to antithrombotic initiation, and treatment interruption, i.e., treatment halted for a surgical procedure and restarted postoperatively. Chi-square, Fisher exact, Spearman's rank-order correlation, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Kruskal-Wallis, and Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates were used to evaluate associations with the outcomes. Results: A total of 189 patients with BCVI were included. The median (IQR) time from arrival to antithrombotic initiation was 27 (8-61) hours, and 28% of patients had treatment interrupted. The ischemic stroke rate was 7.5% (n = 14), with most strokes (64%, n = 9) occurring between arrival and treatment initiation. Treatment interruption was associated with ischemic stroke (75% of patients with stroke had an interruption versus 24% of patients with no stroke; P < .01). Time on anticoagulants was not associated with ischemic stroke (P = .78), transfusion (P = .43), or ICH (P = .96). Similarly, time on antiplatelets (P = .54, P = .65, P = .60) and time on combination therapy (P = .96, P = .38, P = .57) were not associated with these outcomes. Conclusions: The timing and consistency of antithrombotic administration are critical in preventing adverse outcomes in patients with BCVI. Most ischemic strokes in this study population occurred between arrival and antithrombotic initiation, representing events that may potentially be intervened upon by earlier treatment. Future studies should examine the safety of continuing treatment through surgical procedures.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Biffl W.L.
        • Cothren C.C.
        • Moore E.E.
        • et al.
        Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: screening for and treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injuries.
        J Trauma. 2009; 67: 1150-1153https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c1c1d6
        • DiCocco J.M.
        • Fabian T.C.
        • Emmett K.P.
        • et al.
        Functional outcomes following blunt cerebrovascular injury.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 74: 955-960https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318287800f
        • Cothren C.C.
        • Moore E.E.
        • Ray C.E.
        • et al.
        Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries is cost-effective.
        Am J Surg. 2005; 190: 849-854https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2005.08.007
        • Bachier M.
        • Eubanks J.W.
        Blunt cerebrovascular injuries in children: when is aggressive management necessary?.
        Curr Surg Reports. 2014; 2: 64https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-014-0064-z
      1. Shahan CP, Stavely TC, Croce MA, et al. Long-Term Functional Outcomes after Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: A 20-Year Experience. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/sesc/tas/2018/00000084/00000004/art00030. Accessed April 30, 2019.

        • Hundersmarck D.
        • Slooff W.B.M.
        • Homans J.F.
        • et al.
        Blunt cerebrovascular injury: incidence and long-term follow-up.
        Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01171-9
        • Fabian T.C.
        • Patton J.H.
        • Croce M.A.
        • et al.
        Blunt carotid injury. Importance of early diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy.
        Ann Surg. 1996; 223 (discussion 522-5) (Accessed November 28, 2018): 513-522
        • Cogbill T.H.
        • Moore E.E.
        • Meissner M.
        • et al.
        The spectrum of blunt injury to the carotid artery: a multicenter perspective.
        J Trauma. 1994; 37 (Accessed November 28, 2018): 473-479
        • Biffl W.L.
        • Moore E.E.
        • Ryu R.K.
        • et al.
        The unrecognized epidemic of blunt carotid arterial injuries: early diagnosis improves neurologic outcome.
        Ann Surg. 1998; 228 (Accessed November 28, 2018): 462-470
        • Wahl W.L.
        • Brandt M.-M.
        • Thompson B.G.
        • et al.
        Antiplatelet therapy: an alternative to heparin for blunt carotid injury.
        J Trauma. 2002; 52 (Accessed November 28, 2018): 896-901
        • Bromberg W.J.
        • Collier B.C.
        • Diebel L.N.
        • et al.
        Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.
        J Trauma. 2010; 68: 471-477https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cb43da
        • Biffl W.L.
        • Ray C.E.
        • Moore E.E.
        • et al.
        Treatment-related outcomes from blunt cerebrovascular injuries: importance of routine follow-up arteriography.
        Ann Surg. 2002; 235 (discussion 706-7) (Accessed November 28, 2018): 699-706
        • Miller P.R.
        • Fabian T.C.
        • Croce M.A.
        • et al.
        Prospective screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: analysis of diagnostic modalities and outcomes.
        Ann Surg. 2002; 236 (discussion 393-5): 386-393https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SLA.0000027174.01008.A0
        • Biffl W.L.
        • Moore E.E.
        • Offner P.J.
        • et al.
        Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale.
        J Trauma. 1999; 47 (Accessed November 28, 2018): 845-853
        • Stein D.M.
        • Boswell S.
        • Sliker C.W.
        • et al.
        Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Does Treatment Always Matter?.
        J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2009; 66: 132-144https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318142d146
        • Bruns B.R.
        • Tesoriero R.
        • Kufera J.
        • et al.
        Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening guidelines: what are we willing to miss?.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014; 76: 691-695https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab1b4d
      2. Western Trauma Association. Screening for and treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injuries algorithm. http://westerntrauma.org/algorithms/ScreeningForAndTreatmentOfBluntCerebrovascularInjuries/Introduction.html. Published 2012. Accessed March 13, 2019.

        • Spaniolas K.
        • Velmahos G.C.
        • Alam H.B.
        • et al.
        Does improved detection of blunt vertebral artery injuries lead to improved outcomes? Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank®.
        World J Surg. 2008; 32: 2190-2194https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9687-5
        • Weber C.D.
        • Lefering R.
        • Kobbe P.
        • et al.
        Blunt cerebrovascular artery injury and stroke in severely injured patients: an international multicenter analysis.
        World J Surg. 2018; 42: 2043-2053https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4408-6
        • Cothren C.C.
        • Moore E.E.
        • Biffl W.L.
        • et al.
        Anticoagulation is the gold standard therapy for blunt carotid injuries to reduce stroke rate.
        Arch Surg. 2004; 139 (discussion 545-6): 540-545https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.5.540
        • Miller P.R.
        • Fabian T.C.
        • Bee T.K.
        • et al.
        Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: diagnosis and treatment.
        J Trauma. 2001; 51 (discussion 285-6) (Accessed November 28, 2018): 279-285
        • Kearon C.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Ornelas J.
        • et al.
        Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.
        Chest. 2016; 149: 315-352https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.026
        • Colella J.J.
        • Diamond D.L.
        Blunt carotid injury: reassessing the role of anticoagulation.
        Am Surg. 1996; 62 (Accessed November 28, 2018): 212-217
        • Harrigan M.R.
        • Weinberg J.A.
        • Peaks Y.-S.
        • et al.
        Management of blunt extracranial traumatic cerebrovascular injury: a multidisciplinary survey of current practice.
        World J Emerg Surg. 2011; 6: 11https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-6-11
        • Daou B.
        • Hammer C.
        • Mouchtouris N.
        • et al.
        Anticoagulation vs Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients with Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissection: A Study of 370 Patients and Literature Review.
        Neurosurgery. 2017; 80: 368-379https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyw086
        • Edwards N.M.
        • Fabian T.C.
        • Claridge J.A.
        • Timmons S.D.
        • Fischer P.E.
        • Croce M.A.
        Antithrombotic therapy and endovascular stents are effective treatment for blunt carotid injuries: results from longterm followup.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204 (discussion 1014-5): 1007-1013https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.041
        • Alterman D.M.
        • Heidel R.E.
        • Daley B.J.
        • et al.
        Contemporary outcomes of vertebral artery injury.
        J Vasc Surg. 2013; 57: 741-746https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.006
        • Burlew C.C.
        • Sumislawski J.J.
        • Behnfield C.D.
        • et al.
        Time to stroke.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018; 85: 858-866https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001989
        • Eastman A.L.
        • Muraliraj V.
        • Sperry J.L.
        • Minei J.P.
        CTA-Based Screening Reduces Time to Diagnosis and Stroke Rate in Blunt Cervical Vascular Injury.
        J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2009; 67: 551-556https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b84408
        • Brommeland T.
        • Helseth E.
        • Aarhus M.
        • et al.
        Best practice guidelines for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI).
        Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018; 26: 90https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0559-1
        • Louis S.G.
        • Sato M.
        • Geraci T.
        • et al.
        Correlation of missed doses of enoxaparin with increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis in trauma and general surgery patients.
        JAMA Surg. 2014; 149: 365https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3963
        • Geddes A.E.
        • Burlew C.C.
        • Wagenaar A.E.
        • et al.
        Expanded screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injury: a bigger impact than anticipated.
        Am J Surg. 2016; 212: 1167-1174https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.016
        • Scott W.W.
        • Sharp S.
        • Figueroa S.A.
        • et al.
        Clinical and radiographic outcomes following traumatic Grade 1 and 2 carotid artery injuries: a 10-year retrospective analysis from a Level I trauma center. The Parkland Carotid and Vertebral Artery Injury Survey.
        J Neurosurg. 2015; 122: 1196-1201https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.1.JNS14642
        • DiCocco J.M.
        • Fabian T.C.
        • Emmett K.P.
        • et al.
        Optimal outcomes for patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI): tailoring treatment to the lesion.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 212 (discussion 557-9): 549-557https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.035
        • McNutt M.K.
        • Kale A.C.
        • Kitagawa R.S.
        • et al.
        Management of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) in the multisystem injury patient with contraindications to immediate anti-thrombotic therapy.
        Injury. 2018; 49: 67-74https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.07.036
        • Kudo D.
        • Kushimoto S.
        • Shiraishi A.
        • et al.
        The impact of preinjury antithrombotic medication on hemostatic interventions in trauma patients.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2017; 35: 62-65https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJEM.2016.10.002
        • Ning S.
        • Barty R.
        • Liu Y.
        • et al.
        Platelet Transfusion Practices in the ICU: Data From a Large Transfusion Registry.
        Chest. 2016; 150: 516-523https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEST.2016.04.004